Supreme Court Restores Voting and Speaking Rights to Maine Lawmaker

The Supreme Court has restored the voting and speaking rights of Maine State Rep. Laurel Libby, a Republican who was previously censured by her colleagues. Libby lost these rights after refusing to apologize for a controversial Facebook post about a transgender athlete winning first place in a girls’ pole vault competition—a decision that prompted her removal from key legislative activities.

Libby’s situation quickly became a high-profile legal issue when she made her remarks on social media. In her post, she stated, “We’ve learned that just ONE year ago John was competing in boy’s pole vault… that’s when he had his 5th place finish. So all of this transpired in the last year, with the full blessing of the Maine Principals’ Association.” She also noted, “Two years ago, John tied for 5th place in boy’s pole vault. Tonight, ‘Katie’ won 1st place in the girls’ Maine State Class B Championship.” These quotes were at the heart of the controversy that led to her censure.

The Supreme Court’s decision saw a split among the justices. All the conservative justices along with Liberal Justice Elena Kagan joined the majority in favor of restoring Libby’s rights. However, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. Justice Jackson commented on the urgency of the case by saying, “The First Circuit is moving quickly to evaluate the legal issues this case presents, with oral argument scheduled to occur in a few weeks.” She further remarked, “Meanwhile, before us, the applicants have not asserted that there are any significant legislative votes scheduled in the upcoming weeks; that there are any upcoming votes in which Libby’s participation would impact the outcome; or that they will otherwise suffer any concrete, imminent, and significant harm while the lower court considers this matter.”

Libby’s censure, which removed her voting and speaking rights, was imposed because she did not apologize for her Facebook post. On Tuesday, she took to X to announce the decision, tweeting, “VICTORY! The U.S. Supreme Court just restored the voice of 9,000 Mainers! After 2+ months of being silenced for speaking up for Maine girls, I can once again vote on behalf of the people of House District 90.” She added, “This is a win for free speech — and for the Constitution.”

On the other side of the debate, Democratic Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey defended the original censure. He argued that “Rep. Libby has steadfastly refused to comply with this modest punishment, which is designed to restore the integrity and reputation of the body,” referring to a longstanding rule of the Maine House. Frey explained that Rule 401(11) prohibits members found in breach of House rules from participating in debates or voting until they have “made satisfaction,” meaning in this case, issued an apology.

In a related development, President Donald Trump recently celebrated a significant Supreme Court win regarding the status of TPS for Venezuelan migrants, with the court’s ruling changing the landscape of immigration policy. For more detailed updates, viewers can refer to the reports on Fox News.

More Reading

Post navigation